Close

Articles Posted in MCAD Digest

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Carta v. Wingate Healthcare…Employee Gets Emotional Distress Damages in Disability Discrimination Case

Overview: In Carta v. Wingate Healthcare, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant, a 69-year-old and qualified handicapped individual who was terminated from her health care position. The MCAD awarded emotional distress damages and ordered the Respondent to conduct training of certain human resources employees after the Complainant was…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Savage v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission…Employee Wins Disability Discrimination Case

Overview: In Savage v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded substantial back pay and emotional distress damages for employment discrimination based on a disability. The Complainant had a history of dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, and chronic depression prior to being hired by the…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Chase-Eason v. Crescent Yacht Club…Employees Win Sexual Harassment Case

Overview: In Chase-Eason v. Crescent Yacht Club, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainants, awarding back pay to one of them and emotional distress damages to both. Complainant Eason was subjected to unwanted touching and vulgar comments that were sufficiently severe to alter the conditions of her employment and…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Radwin v. Mass. General Hospital… Retaliation and Religion-Based Discrimination Complaint is Dismissed

Overview: In Radwin v. Mass General Hospital, the MCAD found in favor of the Respondent and dismissed the complaint from a nurse researcher alleging that she was discharged from her position in retaliation for raising the issue that certain events and meetings were scheduled on or around Jewish holidays. The…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Wilson v. MA Dept. of Transitional Assistance…Race-Based Discrimination Claim Against State Agency is Dismissed

Overview: In Wilson v. MA Dept. of Transitional Assistance, the MCAD found in favor of the Respondent and dismissed the complaint alleging that employees at a state agency had engaged in discrimination on the basis of race/color and retaliation. The Complainant’s testimony relied largely on claims that several employees repeatedly…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Mayer v. Boston Children’s Hospital…Complaint Against Hospital is Dismissed

Overview: In Mayer v. Boston Children’s Hospital, the MCAD found in favor of the Respondent and dismissed the complaint accusing the hospital of terminating a sixty-four-year-old nurse due to age-based discrimination. The hearing officer found no direct evidence of discriminatory animus in stray remarks apparently made to the Complainant, such…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Bako v. Omega Foods…Dunkin’ Donuts Franchise Operator Sees Complaint Dismissed

Overview: In Bako v. Omega Foods, the MCAD found in favor of the Respondent and dismissed the complaint accusing the Dunkin’ Donuts operator of discrimination based on disability after the employee was not immediately returned to her prior shift following a nine-month medical leave of absence for breast cancer treatment.…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Picco v. Town of Reading…Employee Wins Sexual Harassment Case

Overview: In Picco v. Town of Reading, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded emotional distress damages. This is the MCAD’s second decision in 2016. Although this case began based on causes of action for sexual orientation and perceived sexual orientation, the hearing officer noted that the…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Cooper v. Raytheon…Employee Wins Handicap Discrimination Case

Overview: In Cooper v. Raytheon, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded emotional distress damages. This is the MCAD’s third decision in 2016. In finding that Raytheon engaged in handicap discrimination, the hearing officer noted that the Complainant’s managers knew that he suffered from a brain injury…

Updated:

Summary Judgment in Sexual Harassment & Employment Discrimination Cases

Before proceeding to trial, an employment discrimination case in court must survive a hurdle in the procedural process known as summary judgment, which is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 56 and Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure (MRCP) 56. As discussed here, the process is different when an…

Contact Us